Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule7 played

2025-11-02vs Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5SSplit 1–1

L#1 DoublesShawn Abel / Pamela Ferrell vs Rachel Rodriguez / Jennifer Stringer3-6, 1-6

W#3 DoublesGretchen Allen / Katharine Saunders vs Christine Slote / Deborah Arnold6-0, 6-1

2025-11-02Lost 0–1

L#3 DoublesRachel Brownlee / Katharine Saunders vs Kelly Oujezdsky / Margaret Cooley6-7, 6-7

2025-10-26Won 1–0

W#3 DoublesShawn Abel / Hazel Robbins vs Lori Stern / Stephanie King2-6, 6-1, 1-0

2025-10-12vs High Point/Mallaki W 3.5SWon 1–0

W#3 DoublesKatharine Saunders / Gretchen Allen vs Luming Parsley / Kit Kwong6-1, 6-1

2025-09-28Lost 0–1

L#1 SinglesKatharine Saunders vs Marci Frenkel2-6, 7-5, 0-1

2025-09-14vs Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5SWon 1–0

W#2 DoublesHazel Robbins / Katharine Saunders vs Elaine Ayres / Sheri Tackett6-4, 6-1

2025-09-07vs Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5SWon 1–0

W#3 DoublesShawn Abel / Rachel Brownlee vs Lisa Leder / Julie Stein6-2, 6-2

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S	8	0	21	11	28	236
2Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5S	7	1	23	9	23	250
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S	7	1	24	8	25	243
4Greenhill/Wilder-Mulhern W3.5S	6	1	23	5	15	193
5Jack Coleman TC/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5S	6	1	16	12	28	226
6Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S	6	2	22	10	23	236
7Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S	6	2	21	11	27	238
8The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5S	6	2	15	17	37	291
9Huffhines/Rodriguez W3.5S	5	2	17	11	26	247
10Jack Coleman TC/Sisk-Griffin W3.5S	5	3	18	14	31	284
11Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5S	5	3	15	17	36	278
12McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S	4	3	15	13	29	239
13LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5S	4	3	14	14	34	265
14Oak Creek/Grubstein/Greenstone W3.5S	4	4	16	16	35	270
15High Point/Mallaki W 3.5S	4	4	16	16	35	297
16High Point/Herling W3.5S	3	5	18	14	33	292
17Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5S	3	5	17	15	35	283
18Greenhill/Votava-Cole W3.5S	2	5	14	14	32	240
19Samuell Grand/Leary W3.5S	2	5	10	18	40	274
20Stonebridge Ranch/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S	2	6	13	19	42	303
21Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5S	1	6	12	16	34	283
22Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S	1	6	9	19	43	298
23Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S	1	7	10	22	48	331
24Prince of Peace/Smith W3.5S	1	7	7	25	53	355
25Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni	0	7	4	24	49	312
26Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S	0	8	6	26	54	357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59

Jacqueline Carson

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.58

Sarah Snitker

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

3.40

Jenifer Mathews

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published —

3.31

Gretchen Allen

usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5

3.27

Katharine Saunders

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published —

3.24

Ashley Samber

usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.22

Hazel Robbins

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.20

Shawn Abel

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

3.14

Kim Henke

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

3.07

Rachel Brownlee

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

3.04

Shelley Staten

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

2.96

Pamela Ferrell

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Meghan Rosener

usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Tarryn Uran

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gretchen Allen + Ashley Samber	7–2	62% games	+11.8% vs expected
Ashley Samber + Sarah Snitker	12–3	62% games	+7.3% vs expected
Sarah Snitker + Jacqueline Carson	7–2	63% games	+2.1% vs expected
Hazel Robbins + Tarryn Uran	6–2	60% games	not enough data
Shelley Staten + Kim Henke	4–2	55% games	not enough data
Rachel Brownlee + Kim Henke	2–3	40% games	not enough data
Jenifer Mathews + Sarah Snitker	4–0	4 matches	not enough data
Ashley Samber + Tarryn Uran	2–2	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Jacqueline Carson

44W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026

<1%24%76%

3.59

—

Sarah Snitker

44W–10L career · 15 lines in 2026

<1%26%74%

3.58

—

Jenifer Mathews

20W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%78%22%

3.40

3.5

Gretchen Allen

39W–9L career · 13 lines in 2026

1%92%7%

3.31

—

Katharine Saunders

12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026

2%94%4%

3.27

3.5

Ashley Samber

33W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026

3%94%2%

3.24

3.5

Hazel Robbins

18W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026

5%94%2%

3.22

—

Shawn Abel

9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026

6%93%1%

3.20

—

Kim Henke

11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026

14%86%<1%

3.14

—

Rachel Brownlee

11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026

28%71%<1%

3.07

—

Shelley Staten

8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026

39%61%<1%

3.04

—

Pamela Ferrell

37W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%64%36%

2.96

—

Meghan Rosener

18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Tarryn Uran

25W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.