The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

24 players · average NTRP 3.43 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule5 played

2025-10-26Lost 0–1

L#1 DoublesJill Fain / Allison Leeper vs Stephanie Hilliard / Rita Kessler4-6, 7-5, 0-1

2025-10-19vs Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5SLost 0–1

L#1 DoublesAllison Leeper / Carlin Mihm vs Laura Walker / Rennie Vandermeer1-6, 5-7

2025-10-05vs Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5SLost 0–1

L#1 DoublesMichelle Silver / Allison Leeper vs Madeleine Riehl / Karen Saland4-6, 2-6

2025-09-21vs Prince of Peace/Smith W3.5SLost 0–1

L#1 SinglesAllison Leeper vs Kaley Medina1-6, 0-6

2025-09-07Lost 0–1

L#1 SinglesAllison Leeper vs Samantha Wicker2-6, 1-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S	8	0	21	11	28	236
2Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5S	7	1	23	9	23	250
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S	7	1	24	8	25	243
4Greenhill/Wilder-Mulhern W3.5S	6	1	23	5	15	193
5Jack Coleman TC/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5S	6	1	16	12	28	226
6Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S	6	2	22	10	23	236
7Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S	6	2	21	11	27	238
8The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5S	6	2	15	17	37	291
9Huffhines/Rodriguez W3.5S	5	2	17	11	26	247
10Jack Coleman TC/Sisk-Griffin W3.5S	5	3	18	14	31	284
11Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5S	5	3	15	17	36	278
12McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S	4	3	15	13	29	239
13LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5S	4	3	14	14	34	265
14Oak Creek/Grubstein/Greenstone W3.5S	4	4	16	16	35	270
15High Point/Mallaki W 3.5S	4	4	16	16	35	297
16High Point/Herling W3.5S	3	5	18	14	33	292
17Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5S	3	5	17	15	35	283
18Greenhill/Votava-Cole W3.5S	2	5	14	14	32	240
19Samuell Grand/Leary W3.5S	2	5	10	18	40	274
20Stonebridge Ranch/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S	2	6	13	19	42	303
21Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5S	1	6	12	16	34	283
22Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S	1	6	9	19	43	298
23Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S	1	7	10	22	48	331
24Prince of Peace/Smith W3.5S	1	7	7	25	53	355
25Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni	0	7	4	24	49	312
26Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S	0	8	6	26	54	357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49

Michelle Buchanan

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

3.45

Carlin Mihm

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.45

Brenda Bingham

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.40

Kristi Flanagan

usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 18% · published —

3.40

Michelle Silver

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

3.39

Tracy Akbany

usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

3.37

Jill Fain

usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published —

3.35

Kimberly DiNota

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

3.35

Heidi Fuller

usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published —

3.33

Christie Rymsza

usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

3.33

Jennifer Lazar

published —

3.32

Jennifer Byrne

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

3.29

Elizabeth Maurice

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

3.27

Shelly Gillert

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

3.26

Allison Leeper

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5

—

Christine Little

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.22

Natalie Weatherford

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

3.21

Heather Alwood

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

3.15

Amanda Fritz

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3

3.12

Courtney Dunagan

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.11

Kristi Merrill

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Karen McLeland

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published —

—

Kristie Lipper

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Tamra Bryan

published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Silver + Tracy Akbany	3–3	58% games	+6.9% vs expected
Michelle Buchanan + Tracy Akbany	3–2	56% games	+3.4% vs expected
Allison Leeper + Carlin Mihm	3–2	53% games	not enough data
Kristi Merrill + Jennifer Byrne	2–2	4 matches	not enough data
Michelle Buchanan + Michelle Silver	2–2	4 matches	not enough data
Allison Leeper + Kristie Lipper	2–1	3 matches	not enough data
Allison Leeper + Amanda Fritz	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Jill Fain + Kristi Flanagan	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Michelle Buchanan

16W–18L career · 10 lines in 2026

52%48%<1%

3.49

3.5

Carlin Mihm

15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%63%37%

3.45

3.5

Brenda Bingham

19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026

<1%63%37%

3.45

—

Kristi Flanagan

26W–16L career · 11 lines in 2026

<1%76%23%

3.40

—

Michelle Silver

19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%76%23%

3.40

—

Tracy Akbany

25W–26L career · 10 lines in 2026

<1%78%22%

3.39

—

Jill Fain

23W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%81%18%

3.37

—

Kimberly DiNota

25W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026

1%85%15%

3.35

—

Heidi Fuller

17W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

3.35

3.5

Christie Rymsza

14W–5L career · 10 lines in 2026

1%88%11%

3.33

—

Jennifer Lazar

9W–9L career · no lines in 2026

1%88%11%

3.33

—

Jennifer Byrne

14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

1%89%9%

3.32

—

Elizabeth Maurice

5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

3.29

—

Shelly Gillert

8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.27

3.5

Allison Leeper

16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.26

3.5

Christine Little

3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026

not enough data

—

Natalie Weatherford

17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026

6%92%2%

3.22

—

Heather Alwood

1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026

7%91%2%

3.21

Amanda Fritz

15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026

<1%15%85%

3.15

3.5

Courtney Dunagan

13W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026

20%80%<1%

3.12

—

Kristi Merrill

8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

22%77%<1%

3.11

—

Karen McLeland

7W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kristie Lipper

12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Tamra Bryan

3W–1L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.