The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

19 players · average NTRP 3.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule2 played

2025-11-02vs Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5SLost 0–1

L#3 DoublesAmber James / Shereen Yasin vs Sheila MacHado / Andrea Montuori3-6, 2-6

2025-09-14Lost 0–1

L#2 DoublesShereen Yasin / Silvia Tapia vs Lindsey Hutchinson / Katie Campbell6-4, 3-6, 1-0

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S	8	0	21	11	28	236
2Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5S	7	1	23	9	23	250
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S	7	1	24	8	25	243
4Greenhill/Wilder-Mulhern W3.5S	6	1	23	5	15	193
5Jack Coleman TC/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5S	6	1	16	12	28	226
6Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S	6	2	22	10	23	236
7Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S	6	2	21	11	27	238
8The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5S	6	2	15	17	37	291
9Huffhines/Rodriguez W3.5S	5	2	17	11	26	247
10Jack Coleman TC/Sisk-Griffin W3.5S	5	3	18	14	31	284
11Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5S	5	3	15	17	36	278
12McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S	4	3	15	13	29	239
13LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5S	4	3	14	14	34	265
14Oak Creek/Grubstein/Greenstone W3.5S	4	4	16	16	35	270
15High Point/Mallaki W 3.5S	4	4	16	16	35	297
16High Point/Herling W3.5S	3	5	18	14	33	292
17Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5S	3	5	17	15	35	283
18Greenhill/Votava-Cole W3.5S	2	5	14	14	32	240
19Samuell Grand/Leary W3.5S	2	5	10	18	40	274
20Stonebridge Ranch/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S	2	6	13	19	42	303
21Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5S	1	6	12	16	34	283
22Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S	1	6	9	19	43	298
23Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S	1	7	10	22	48	331
24Prince of Peace/Smith W3.5S	1	7	7	25	53	355
25Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni	0	7	4	24	49	312
26Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S	0	8	6	26	54	357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78

Samantha Wicker

usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

3.64

August Wood

usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.48

Heather Perkins

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published —

3.47

Chasti Gest

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.40

Carrie Neale

usually #1 Singles 85%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published 3.5

3.39

Clare Holbrook

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.39

Silvia Tapia

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

3.39

Anne Givens

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5

3.37

Stephanie Barna

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published —

3.37

Kelly Penny

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

3.25

Christine Babcock

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.17

Mandi Schmitz

usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published —

3.14

Amber James

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

3.12

Leah Arnold

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

3.05

Julie Harner

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

3.02

Shereen Yasin

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

3.00

Mimi Mansour

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

2.79

Alexis Prochnow

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3

—

Kaitlyn Scott

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

August Wood + Chasti Gest	15–3	63% games	+6.9% vs expected
Chasti Gest + Anne Givens	9–3	59% games	−0.0% vs expected
Anne Givens + Stephanie Barna	6–0	64% games	not enough data
Anne Givens + Silvia Tapia	0–6	36% games	not enough data
Mandi Schmitz + Leah Arnold	2–2	4 matches	not enough data
Kelly Penny + Anne Givens	3–0	3 matches	not enough data
Amber James + Julie Harner	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Julie Harner + Alexis Prochnow	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Samantha Wicker

19W–2L career · 9 lines in 2026

2%92%6%

3.78

August Wood

39W–17L career · 14 lines in 2026

16%83%<1%

3.64

—

Heather Perkins

23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%55%45%

3.48

3.5

Chasti Gest

37W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%59%41%

3.47

3.5

Carrie Neale

43W–15L career · 13 lines in 2026

<1%75%25%

3.40

3.5

Clare Holbrook

18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%78%22%

3.39

—

Silvia Tapia

9W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%78%22%

3.39

3.5

Anne Givens

35W–24L career · 11 lines in 2026

<1%79%21%

3.39

—

Stephanie Barna

27W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%82%17%

3.37

—

Kelly Penny

13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%82%17%

3.37

3.5

Christine Babcock

19W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026

3%93%4%

3.25

—

Mandi Schmitz

21W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026

11%88%1%

3.17

Amber James

17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026

<1%16%84%

3.14

—

Leah Arnold

20W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%19%81%

3.12

—

Julie Harner

10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

35%65%<1%

3.05

—

Shereen Yasin

1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026

44%56%<1%

3.02

—

Mimi Mansour

10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026

51%49%<1%

3.00

Alexis Prochnow

16W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

2.79

—

Kaitlyn Scott

9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.