Teams

Oak Creek/Grubstein/Greenstone W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKay Ellen Pollack vs Marci Frenkel3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKay Ellen Pollack vs Leila Gibson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5SLost 01
L#1 SinglesVandi Palmer vs Leigh Armstrong0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S80211128236
2Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5S7123923250
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S7124825243
4Greenhill/Wilder-Mulhern W3.5S6123515193
5Jack Coleman TC/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5S61161228226
6Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S62221023236
7Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S62211127238
8The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5S62151737291
9Huffhines/Rodriguez W3.5S52171126247
10Jack Coleman TC/Sisk-Griffin W3.5S53181431284
11Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5S53151736278
12McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S43151329239
13LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5S43141434265
14Oak Creek/Grubstein/Greenstone W3.5S44161635270
15High Point/Mallaki W 3.5S44161635297
16High Point/Herling W3.5S35181433292
17Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5S35171535283
18Greenhill/Votava-Cole W3.5S25141432240
19Samuell Grand/Leary W3.5S25101840274
20Stonebridge Ranch/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S26131942303
21Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5S16121634283
22Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S1691943298
23Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S17102248331
24Prince of Peace/Smith W3.5S1772553355
25Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni0742449312
26Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S0862654357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Lori Stern
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.61
Amanda Forrest
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.51
Stephanie Shah
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.43
Stephanie Friedman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Julie Sayah
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.32
Rena Grubstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Brett Levy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Wincy Tomecko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Heidi Aiken
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Joy Sebold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.19
Rachel Ladin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Joanna Greenstone
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.17
Kim Velevis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Wendy Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Kay Ellen Pollack
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Jennifer Chazanow
published
2.98
Carrie Song
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Vandi Palmer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Marianne Hark
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Sarah Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Forrest + Rena Grubstein6169% games+12.6% vs expected
Stephanie Friedman + Julie Sayah6462% games+10.1% vs expected
Julie Sayah + Joanna Greenstone4348% games+5.8% vs expected
Wendy Kaplan + Rena Grubstein5258% games+5.7% vs expected
Stephanie Shah + Joy Sebold6645% games−2.8% vs expected
Joanna Greenstone + Lori Stern4356% games−8.4% vs expected
Wendy Kaplan + Sarah Clayton3349% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Kaplan + Kim Velevis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Stern
24W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Amanda Forrest
29W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
Stephanie Shah
49W–29L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Stephanie Friedman
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Julie Sayah
25W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Rena Grubstein
21W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Brett Levy
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Wincy Tomecko
11W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Heidi Aiken
26W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Joy Sebold
19W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Rachel Ladin
15W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Joanna Greenstone
25W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Kim Velevis
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Wendy Kaplan
15W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kay Ellen Pollack
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jennifer Chazanow
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Carrie Song
11W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Vandi Palmer
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.62
Marianne Hark
14W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Clayton
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.