Teams

BETC-Happy and Wiser Aces-Grove

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-01vs AYTC-Honey Deuces-StewartLost 23
L#1 DoublesHappy Grove / MARILYN PORTER vs Reese Cowan Stewart / Anne Diaw6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Yamamoto vs Caitlin McConnico2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRuthann Nelson / Mary Jordan vs Jenn Gile / Juliet Friedl6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJenna Netland vs Erin Corson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSylvian Colley / Cathy Hollar vs Darozyl Touch / Kate Clay6-3, 6-4
2024-05-19vs WSC-Wildcards-BibireataWon 32
L#1 DoublesRuthann Nelson / Sylvian Colley vs Brenna Loury / Svetlana Petculescu5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Yamamoto vs Sandra Cullen6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Hollar / Mary Jordan vs Monica Cretu / Alina Bibireata6-7, 2-5
W#2 SinglesJenna Netland vs Nikki Ryu Kitagaito6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHappy Grove / Joan Edwards vs Virginia Onu / Irina Salvan6-1, 6-0
2024-05-11vs BC-Anderson/TursaLost 14
L#1 DoublesJill Wakefield / Barbara Selemon vs Sherilyn Anderson / Sandra Stark3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Yamamoto vs Bridget Haba4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHappy Grove / Sylvian Colley vs Ellen Yoon / Vikki Littleman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKatherine Kim vs Myoungju Baek4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJenna Netland / Ming Vuong vs Rosie Mastrandrea / Carolina DeHaan6-3, 6-1
2024-05-04vs CAC/SL-Ballsy B’s-McCarronLost 14
L#1 DoublesDebbie Donovan / Rebecca Mann vs Tracy McCarron / Karen Lang4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesQue-Phuong Tran vs Yasmine Hejazi0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Javelli / Jill Wakefield vs Julie Dewitt / Bunny Rogan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKatherine Kim vs Lindsey Brandt4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Edwards / Barbara Selemon vs Vandella Stewart / Jennifer Miller7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-27vs NTC-KennedyLost 23
L#1 DoublesQue-Phuong Tran / Amy Yamamoto vs Sarah Wilke / Jane Saddler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatherine Kim vs Katharine Mancini4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSally Linebarger / Happy Grove vs Erin Kennedy / Kim Scott0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJenna Netland vs Valerie Gilbert6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Selemon / Ming Vuong vs Junghee Kim / Lesley Burvill Holmes7-5, 6-3
2024-04-21vs PSC-LuLost 14
L#1 DoublesDebbie Donovan / Ruthann Nelson vs Yi Cao / Celia Zhu4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHappy Grove vs Jiaxi Deng2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Wakefield / Sylvian Colley vs Dingding Lu / Kuniko Jacobson4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKatherine Kim vs Gabi Ifrim6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Jordan / Diane Javelli vs Nan Li / Lingqing Wang2-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs RTC-Landry-NavarroLost 23
W#1 DoublesHappy Grove / Cathy Hollar vs Karen Ng / Margaret Landry-Navarro6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Yamamoto vs Sarah Villarreal3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJill Wakefield / Ming Vuong vs Soo Chin / Tammi Tompkins3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJenna Netland vs Lynn Dai0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSally Linebarger / Joan Edwards vs Savitha Krammer / Jacque Cao2-6, 2-6
2024-04-07vs TCSP-Down The Line-BuscherWon 32
L#1 DoublesCathy Hollar / MARILYN PORTER vs Anna Hundt / Heather Michail0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJenna Netland vs Sarah Vogel6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Donovan / Ruthann Nelson vs Janice Walters / Erin Oest-Larsen6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMary Jordan vs Alice Lee0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Mann / Barbara Selemon vs Julia Sommerfeld / Rhenda Meiser2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-30vs AYTC-Pickled Eggs-BauerLost 14
L#1 DoublesMARILYN PORTER / Rebecca Mann vs Erin McMonigal / Katie Busby2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Yamamoto vs Lori Clithero6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMing Vuong / Mary Jordan vs Lisa Mihm / Viktoria Ralph6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJenna Netland vs Laura Cooper2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSylvian Colley / Barbara Selemon vs Kari Palmer / Makena Barickman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBW-LOVElies-Wyman9039620295
2PL-Baby Got Backhand-Wate9141922286
3AYTC-Serve Us A Double-Hofler91371335372
4STC-Spring-It-Stroble81351028286
5NWW-AYTC-Kim82361441384
6CP-TNT-Chen72301535357
7BC-Brylemore Ballers-Bryant73321841355
8MC-LaRosa/Rust (White)73272349403
9HBSQ-Hip To Be Square-Counter63311434341
10TCSP-Manier63281738314
11CP-Victorious-Dauphiny63261940370
12CAC/SL-Ballsy B’s-McCarron63271844378
13RTC-Landry-Navarro63242145366
14AYTC-Honey Deuces-Stewart63242145390
15BAIN-The Terminetters-Fanberg63271845372
16EDG-Keller63261946360
17TCSP-Sharks-Daniels63232250415
18BC-Krekel64272352409
19HBSQ-Siegrist64242658486
20TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller54291640364
21NTC-Falcons-Wood/Cross54281741387
22RBW-Old Enough To Know Better-Lalime54242149404
23MI-Serves You Right-Laban55282250418
24AYTC-Alley-Oops! Tameling55272353392
25TCSP-Mood Swings-Thorne55262453438
26TCSP-Lusty/Lu55252557447
27ETC-Play To Win-Vrcelj-Nikolic55222866460
28BC-40-Love-Freeborn45232251431
29BC-Anderson/Tursa45242152419
30TCSP-Alleycats-Murch/Knobbs45212452407
31FC-Baseline Babes-Wallach45212452400
32RTC-Serves You Right-Charles45202555434
33STC-Vipers-Crabs36172862422
34HBSQ-James Gang37203063465
35BETC-Happy and Wiser Aces-Grove27162963432
36TCSP-Down The Line-Buscher18182758401
37AYTC-Kane18153063463
38STC-Blume18143169497
39PL-Volley Llamas-Small18103572476
40CP-Net Positive-Baird18103573481
41STC-Dropping Shots-Dressel19133777530
42ETC-Netchix-Swanson0963980511
43WSC-Wildcards-Bibireata0954081515
44RTC-Gorin Eastside Ladies-Cheng01034794576

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Amy Yamamoto
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.86
Debbie Donovan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Jill Wakefield
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Joan Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Happy Grove
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Katherine Kim
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.81
MARILYN PORTER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Sally Linebarger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Que-Phuong Tran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.78
Rebecca Mann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Ruthann Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Cathy Hollar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Ming Vuong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Diane Weiser
published 3
2.56
Diane Javelli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Barbara Selemon
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.46
Sylvian Colley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.22
Mary Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Jenna Netland
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Mann + Happy Grove5063% games+14.7% vs expected
MARILYN PORTER + Jill Wakefield9263% games+9.1% vs expected
Diane Javelli + Debbie Donovan4453% games+6.9% vs expected
Ruthann Nelson + Jill Wakefield9555% games+4.5% vs expected
MARILYN PORTER + Happy Grove5549% games+4.5% vs expected
Diane Weiser + Debbie Donovan5356% games+2.1% vs expected
Diane Weiser + Jill Wakefield9653% games+1.1% vs expected
MARILYN PORTER + Rebecca Mann8652% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Yamamoto
55W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Debbie Donovan
99W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Jill Wakefield
90W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Joan Edwards
35W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Happy Grove
45W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Katherine Kim
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
MARILYN PORTER
111W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Sally Linebarger
73W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Que-Phuong Tran
22W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Rebecca Mann
97W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ruthann Nelson
112W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cathy Hollar
43W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Ming Vuong
96W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Diane Weiser
64W–76L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Diane Javelli
31W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Barbara Selemon
55W–85L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Sylvian Colley
43W–53L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Mary Jordan
24W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Jenna Netland
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.