Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesHyun Young Han / Joanne Rajchel vs Kimberly Wojack / Katrin Maldre3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Joanne Rajchel vs Conni Stinek / Anne Zanella-Gleason4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Pawula / Lisa Sanderson vs Erica Eisner / Zagorka James1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Sanderson / Joanne Rajchel vs Mimi Paffrath / Jill Lawrence Polls4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Joanne Rajchel vs Cara Waddle / Sheila Bondoc3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHyun Young Han / Debra Scheck vs Elisa Zusman / Rosemary Wheeler7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $185114412122
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $255113516139
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $205113516150
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $203371124160
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20249923153
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 3 $201531531187
7CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $200641430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Hoda Elshakankery
published 4.5
3.88
Stephanie Batka
published 4
3.72
Patricia Behnke
published 4
3.60
3.58
Mya Murata
published 4
3.42
Nancy Maska
published 3.5
3.37
Debra Scheck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Julie Pawula
published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Audene Gordon
published 3
2.78
Peggy Schwerman
published 3
Hyun Young Han
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joan Emerick
published
Joanne Rajchel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Batka + Patricia Behnke8556% games+3.5% vs expected
Mya Murata + Patricia Behnke6257% games+1.6% vs expected
Joanne Rajchel + Patricia Behnke91150% games−0.7% vs expected
Mya Murata + Stephanie Batka11752% games−3.4% vs expected
Peggy Schwerman + Julie Pawula121549% gamesnot enough data
Audene Gordon + Julie Pawula101348% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Schwerman + Audene Gordon11948% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Rajchel + Mya Murata8353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hoda Elshakankery
216W–111L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Patricia Behnke
103W–89L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Barbara Lee-Budin
10W–24L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Nancy Maska
52W–89L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Debra Scheck
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Sanderson
14W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Audene Gordon
69W–72L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Peggy Schwerman
123W–136L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Hyun Young Han
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joan Emerick
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joanne Rajchel
40W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.