Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

14 players · average NTRP 3.78 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Annette Hennessy vs Diana Morgan / Laury Scheyer6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Julie Colhoun vs Tory Jarvis / Priscilla Ewaldz4-6, 3-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHuan Chang / Katherine Wood vs Rochelle Meng / Sheila Bondoc1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Nick / Gail Wilson vs Carlene Motto / Debbie Skowron5-7, 6-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Julie Weidner vs Martha English / Katrin Maldre1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Toni OLeary vs Colleen Roberts / Julie Sujack6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJulie Weidner / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Mya Murata / Patricia Behnke5-7, 2-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaula McKendry / Gail Wilson vs Julie Pawula / Joan Emerick6-3, 4-3
L#1 DoublesHuan Chang / Kathy Kasiurak vs Conni Stinek / Anne Zanella-Gleason0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Youngran Chung vs Teri Ayotte / Janice McKane5-7, 4-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Colhoun / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Erica Eisner / Zagorka James4-6, 2-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $185114412122
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $255113516139
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $205113516150
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $203371124160
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20249923153
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 3 $201531531187
7CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $200641430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Huan Chang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Annette Hennessy
published 4
Gail Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Youngran Chung
published 4
3.56
Nancy Manolis
published 4
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.27
Paula McKendry
published 3.5
3.06
Elizabeth Cassier
published 3.5
Julie Colhoun
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Nick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Toni OLeary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lobo-Corey + Nancy Manolis10360% games+4.1% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Weidner203349% games+2.3% vs expected
Annette Hennessy + Julie Weidner6548% games−1.4% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Gail Wilson31436% games−8.8% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Patricia Nick21138% gamesnot enough data
Maria Lobo-Corey + Julie Colhoun5847% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Nick + Gail Wilson4645% gamesnot enough data
Youngran Chung + Julie Weidner2650% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Annette Hennessy
150W–161L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 4 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Youngran Chung
76W–87L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Nancy Manolis
114W–130L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Paula McKendry
88W–95L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elizabeth Cassier
71W–139L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Julie Colhoun
36W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Wood
46W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Nick
46W–77L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Toni OLeary
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.