Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $25

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

15 players · average NTRP 3.78 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesTory Jarvis / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Julie Colhoun6-4, 2-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRosemary Wheeler / Lisa Rosen vs Annette Hennessy / Elizabeth Cassier6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Rosen / Rosemary Wheeler vs Laury Scheyer / Martha Lloyd1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatti Charman / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Conni Stinek / Anne Zanella-Gleason0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTory Jarvis / Rochelle Meng vs Erica Eisner / Zagorka James4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesSheila Bondoc / Patti Charman vs Molly McGinnis / Michele Muchmore7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMindey Johnson / Lisa Rosen vs Angela Lukas / Paula Haggerty2-6, 5-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLing Arenson / Tory Jarvis vs Colleen Roberts / Kimberly Glunz6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristine Blaser / Christina Greeley vs Judy Weik / Karen Walker-Ward6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRochelle Meng / Tory Jarvis vs Stephanie Batka / Joan Emerick1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $185114412122
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $255113516139
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $205113516150
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $203371124160
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20249923153
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 3 $201531531187
7CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $200641430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Cara Waddle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Sheila Bondoc
published 4
3.70
Priscilla Ewaldz
published 4
3.61
Rochelle Meng
published 4
3.61
Ling Arenson
published 4
3.39
Christina Greeley
published 3.5
3.29
Mindey Johnson
published 3.5
3.29
Rosemary Wheeler
published 3.5
3.20
Elisa Zusman
published 3.5
Julie Alexander
published
Kristine Blaser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Rosen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patti Charman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tory Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Yupin Lerner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Ewaldz + Cara Waddle5173% games+16.2% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + Christina Greeley3255% games+10.1% vs expected
Priscilla Ewaldz + Sheila Bondoc4354% games+5.6% vs expected
Tory Jarvis + Rochelle Meng8849% games+3.5% vs expected
Christina Greeley + Cara Waddle13955% games+1.5% vs expected
Mindey Johnson + Rosemary Wheeler6259% games+0.2% vs expected
Sheila Bondoc + Cara Waddle421756% games−0.8% vs expected
Rosemary Wheeler + Rochelle Meng111349% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cara Waddle
162W–117L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Sheila Bondoc
117W–62L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Priscilla Ewaldz
145W–184L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Rochelle Meng
184W–198L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Christina Greeley
226W–208L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Mindey Johnson
122W–64L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Rosemary Wheeler
162W–147L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Elisa Zusman
172W–142L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Julie Alexander
45W–56L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristine Blaser
30W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Rosen
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Charman
33W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tory Jarvis
27W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yupin Lerner
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.