Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesCarlene Motto / Debbie Skowron vs Patricia Nick / Gail Wilson5-7, 6-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Molly McGinnis vs Kimberly Ricchio / Gayle Dominicis1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMolly McGinnis / Michele Muchmore vs Sheila Bondoc / Patti Charman5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Lukas / Paula Haggerty vs Mindey Johnson / Lisa Rosen2-6, 5-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCarlene Motto / Debbie Skowron vs Conni Stinek / Anne Zanella-Gleason3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $185114412122
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $255113516139
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $205113516150
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $203371124160
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20249923153
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 3 $201531531187
7CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $200641430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Nancy Cushing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Michele Muchmore
published 4
3.67
Carlene Motto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Debbie Skowron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Molly McGinnis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Jen Frenzel
published
3.45
Angela Lukas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Heidi Darley
published
Sue Dedmond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly McGinnis + Jen Frenzel12358% games+2.8% vs expected
Debbie Skowron + Carlene Motto7649% games+0.9% vs expected
Molly McGinnis + Michele Muchmore5952% games−5.9% vs expected
Molly McGinnis + Angela Lukas3643% games−15.1% vs expected
Carlene Motto + Nancy Cushing5453% gamesnot enough data
Carlene Motto + Angela Lukas134 matchesnot enough data
Molly McGinnis + Nancy Cushing213 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Skowron + Angela Lukas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Cushing
236W–117L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Michele Muchmore
26W–21L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carlene Motto
131W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Debbie Skowron
64W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Molly McGinnis
62W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Angela Lukas
106W–140L career · 1 line in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
Heidi Darley
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Dedmond
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.