Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

16 players · average NTRP 3.86 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesSara Marberry / Cheryl Watkins vs Joan Vander Linde / Laurie Severino6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDebra Brambora / Sara Marberry vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Nancy Manolis3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Lloyd / Sara Marberry vs Conni Stinek / Anne Zanella-Gleason4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Gray / Ann Wiet vs Erica Eisner / Zagorka James2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGayle Dominicis / Cheryl Watkins vs Cara Waddle / Sheila Bondoc7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKathleen McLaughlin / Mary Etherington vs Mya Murata / Stephanie Batka5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMimi Paffrath / Jill Lawrence Polls vs Lisa Sanderson / Joanne Rajchel6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $185114412122
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $255113516139
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $205113516150
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $203371124160
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20249923153
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 3 $201531531187
7CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $200641430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kimberly Ricchio
published 4
3.69
Gayle Dominicis
published 4
3.68
Mary Etherington
published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
published 4
3.64
Laurie Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Cheryl Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Martha Lloyd
published 4
3.51
Diane McKillen
published 4
3.46
Laury Scheyer
published 4
3.23
Ann Wiet
published 3.5
3.22
Mimi Paffrath
published 3.5
3.12
Diana Morgan
published 3.5
Jill Lawrence Polls
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Ann Martin
published
Sara Marberry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Etherington + Gayle Dominicis14362% games+5.0% vs expected
Kimberly Ricchio + Gayle Dominicis6455% games+1.8% vs expected
Cheryl Watkins + Gayle Dominicis7853% games+1.3% vs expected
Sara Marberry + Martha Lloyd141655% games+1.2% vs expected
Laury Scheyer + Diane McKillen4350% games+1.1% vs expected
Sara Marberry + Gayle Dominicis15953% games+0.3% vs expected
Laurie Gray + Gayle Dominicis533152% games−0.7% vs expected
Debra Brambora + Kimberly Ricchio14756% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kimberly Ricchio
88W–60L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Gayle Dominicis
229W–135L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Mary Etherington
110W–66L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Laurie Gray
162W–113L career · 1 line in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cheryl Watkins
72W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Martha Lloyd
216W–148L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Diane McKillen
89W–54L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Laury Scheyer
56W–44L career · type A · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Ann Wiet
102W–97L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Mimi Paffrath
76W–51L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Diana Morgan
97W–43L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jill Lawrence Polls
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen McLaughlin
29W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sally Ann Martin
37W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Marberry
124W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.