Teams

CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $18

CDTA ESL 55 & Over W · E

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesTerra Jahns / Susan Klawitter vs Gayle Dominicis / Mary Etherington6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Susan Tuthill vs Sheila Bondoc / Cara Waddle1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCathy Evangelist / Terra Jahns vs Kimberly Wojack / Julie Sujack6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Maureen Henderson vs Judy Weik / Karen Walker-Ward6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $185114412122
2CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W MT Bann Jarvis Sat 2 $255113516139
3CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Oak Brook TC Cushing Sun 5 $205113516150
4CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Tam Corey Sat 1 $203371124160
5CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Glenview Lloyd Sat 12 $20249923153
6CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W TF Oak Park Roberts Sat 3 $201531531187
7CDTA E 55&O W/E 8.0W Centre Court Gordon Sun 9 $200641430194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
3.89
Terra Jahns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Erica Eisner
published 4
3.72
Cathy Evangelist
published 4
3.71
Susan Klawitter
published
3.52
Janice McKane
published 4
3.50
Conni Stinek
published 4
3.47
Zagorka James
published 4
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
published
3.22
Maureen Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jan MacK
published
Susan Tuthill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Ayotte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Tuthill + Cathy Evangelist121253% games+4.3% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Anne Zanella-Gleason18760% games+3.9% vs expected
Conni Stinek + Anne Zanella-Gleason311059% games+3.3% vs expected
Conni Stinek + Erica Eisner241754% games+0.4% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Erica Eisner101851% games−0.9% vs expected
Zagorka James + Erica Eisner19960% games−1.4% vs expected
Zagorka James + Conni Stinek10453% games−3.0% vs expected
Janice McKane + Teri Ayotte171352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Zanella-Gleason
111W–59L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Terra Jahns
131W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Cathy Evangelist
108W–96L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Susan Klawitter
32W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Janice McKane
30W–35L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Zagorka James
290W–179L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
Noreen Ohcana
66W–95L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.43
Maureen Henderson
118W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Jan MacK
47W–44L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Tuthill
24W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Teri Ayotte
66W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.