Teams

For the Lob of It

2025 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 3.85 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-19vs Mister and Miss HitsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Malmstrom / Robert Clifford vs Andrew Killorin / Melinda Widows6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Kittelson / Tara Wolf vs Danielle Lofgren / Harrison Cleveland7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDarron Peterson / Bobette Wood vs Andrea Baerwald / Tom von Alten6-2, 6-1
2025-04-12vs MSA 8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Kittelson / Dawn Coder vs Glory Questad / Louis Sabala6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Clifford / Suzanne Malmstrom vs Josh Johnson / Andrea Reynolds2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-06vs TenniscityLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Erin Kohler vs Caleb Warnken / Anna Orrison1-6, 6-7
2025-03-30vs Bringin' the RacketWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Buckingham / Erin Kohler vs Sydney Crabtree / Jeffrey Pugsley6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-30vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBobette Wood / Darron Peterson vs Jeremy Cramer / Sunny Jones3-6, 2-6
2025-03-16vs Guess Who's BackLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Kittelson / Kimberly Clifford vs Tim Trued / Andi Trued6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDarron Peterson / Bobette Wood vs Jacqueline Hickman / Noe Lopez7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Bobette Wood
published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
4.02
Ken Coffey
published 4.5
3.85
Dawn Coder
published 4
3.75
Tara Wolf
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Brian Kittelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.59
3.50
Jason Steele
published 3.5
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
3.31
Erin Kohler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Suzanne Malmstrom
published 3.5
Amanda Steele
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Darron Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Mark Jacobsen
published 3.5
Jeff Malmstrom
published 0
Michelle Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Clifford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead81047% games+7.4% vs expected
Suzanne Malmstrom + Ken Coffey4258% games+4.1% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−2.9% vs expected
Amanda Steele + Jason Steele345448% games−4.0% vs expected
Ken Coffey + Tammie Sevieri-Coffey7552% games−4.0% vs expected
Ken Coffey + Amanda Steele41646% games−11.9% vs expected
Kimberly Clifford + Robert Clifford261650% gamesnot enough data
Mike Buckingham + Michelle Phillips6855% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bobette Wood
280W–115L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.11
4.5
Ken Coffey
117W–84L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Dawn Coder
91W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Tara Wolf
74W–61L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Bill Sharp
53W–62L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brian Kittelson
24W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Tammie Sevieri-Coffey
55W–38L career · type S · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Kimberly Clifford
142W–113L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Jason Steele
134W–112L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Kohler
155W–119L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Suzanne Malmstrom
108W–112L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Amanda Steele
65W–129L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Darron Peterson
26W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Mark Jacobsen
26W–27L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
0
Jeff Malmstrom
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
42W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Clifford
85W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.