Teams

Griffith/Pluymers-Forking Courtballs

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-07vs Geisler-Warrior PrincessesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Cheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-06vs Stromquist/BeldenLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Angie Stromquist / Cate Harrington4-6, 1-6
2022-07-29vs Burns-The Royal TennisbaumsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Kimberly Parks / HOLLY LIBERATORE4-6, 6-7
2022-07-22vs CaseyNolanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Erin Casey / Colleen Nolan1-6, 5-7
2022-07-20vs BillingsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Casey Billings / Gabriela McIntosh4-6, 3-6
2022-07-15vs Stromquist/BeldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Angie Stromquist / Cate Harrington4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-09vs Oh-Kicking AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Nichole Anglin / Sara Swanborn6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-03vs Hastings-The Honey DeucesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers vs Kari Hastings / Inna Vlad4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings32 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mathew-PDX Net Force8080131
2Rockwell-Simply Smashing8080353
3Hastings-The Honey Deuces7171459
4Feng-J&J7171660
5Farrelly-Fireballs6262549
6CaseyNolan6262659
7Irvin/Leissler-Fore Hands5353657
8Habafy5353769
9Martes5353766
10Cooney-The Rackettes5353774
11Stromquist/Belden5353863
12Billings5353872
13Brown/Cofield4444875
14Lamprecht4444985
15Burns-The Royal Tennisbaums4444980
16Meyers-KEELEY44441079
17Pyle/Garris44441077
18Cassin44441184
19Crate/Jurgenson35351066
20Schmidt-Doppio Duo35351076
21Barnatan-Boxing Rabbits35351181
22Walker-I'd Hit That35351291
23Skoog35351284
24Harvey-Awesome 4some35351285
25Mori-Netorious35351389
26Kaplan-G26261291
27Johnson-Jokersons26261382
28Oh-Kicking Aces26261389
29Griffith/Pluymers-Forking Courtballs26261491
30Geisler-Warrior Princesses17171490
31Trank/Norris17171590
32McKay-MacWood17171595

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Rochelle Pluymers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Rebecca Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Griffith + Rochelle Pluymers534952% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rochelle Pluymers
115W–112L career · 8 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Rebecca Griffith
105W–130L career · 12 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.