Teams

RBW-Group Therapy-Ferleman

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-22vs TCSP-Double Mints-SteckLost 12
W#1 DoublesOzzy English / Joanne Yu vs Carrie Morris / Emily Apfel6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLaurie Wilkins vs Wendy Champagne2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Milam / Debara Ferleman vs Christine Henn / Margaret Steck6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-06-15vs MI-KoderaLost 12
L#1 DoublesOzzy English / Julia Boneva vs Laura Althoff / Annie Pearse2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKiera Kim vs Marlita Bang2-6, 3-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Milam / Joanne Yu vs Jennifer Rosenwald / Lily Oshea6-2, 7-5
2021-06-07vs BC-Doubles or Nothing-ArjalLost 12
L#1 DoublesOzzy English / Kiera Kim vs Lisa Mohanty / Shannon Gerity4-6, 5-5
W#1 SinglesLaurie Wilkins vs Genevieve Arjal6-4, 5-3
L#2 DoublesJanet Milam / Debara Ferleman vs Darla Paget / Brooke Stabbert2-6, 5-5
2021-05-17vs TCSP-Double Mints-SteckLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Wilkins / Debara Ferleman vs Carrie Morris / Wendy Champagne6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKiera Kim vs Christine Henn6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Buxbaum / Julia Boneva vs Emily Apfel / Annie Hartsock5-7, 4-3
2021-05-11vs TCSP-40/Love-CamposLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Wilkins / Julia Boneva vs Annabella Chiocco / Priscilla Cypiot4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKiera Kim vs Aniki Olson3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Milam / Joanne Yu vs Valerie Dillard / A C6-3, 6-1
2021-05-03vs MI-KoderaWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Buxbaum / Debara Ferleman vs Laura Althoff / Jennifer Rosenwald7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaurie Wilkins vs Samantha Condiotty6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoanne Yu / Julia Boneva vs Diane Demopulos / Lily Oshea6-1, 6-2
2021-04-27vs BC-Doubles or Nothing-ArjalLost 03
L#1 DoublesOzzy English / Julia Boneva vs Shannon Gerity / Darla Paget5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJanet Milam vs Genevieve Arjal1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebara Ferleman / Joanne Yu vs Lisa Mohanty / Jen Waldher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-26vs TCSP-40/Love-CamposLost 03
L#1 DoublesOzzy English / Julia Boneva vs Aniki Olson / Valerie Dillard6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaurie Wilkins vs Laura Young2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebara Ferleman / Janet Milam vs Annabella Chiocco / Laurie Daiger4-6, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCSP-Volley Girls-Thorne7117718165
2BAIN-Carrillo6015310113
3STC-Buhler6217716180
4AYTC (OUTDOORS) Sets in the City-McKay4211714136
5ETC-Holle44131127213
6MI-Kodera44111328223
7TCSP-Double Mints-Steck44131129240
8BC-Doubles or Nothing-Arjal44111329225
9FC-Basha Tennis-Lydon3381022171
10WSC-Raquettes-Onu3371124185
11PL-Porter35111327213
12BC-Freudenberger35101427214
13ETC-Slicetinis-Tang2481023179
14RBW-Group Therapy-Ferleman1771730219
15CAC/SL-Matter1742040249
16ETC-Racq Pack-Brown0621632206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Kiera Kim
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Joanne Yu
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Rebecca Buxbaum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Ozzy English
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Laurie Wilkins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Debara Ferleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Julia Boneva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Janet Milam
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Yu + Julia Boneva4159% games+13.8% vs expected
Ozzy English + Laurie Wilkins7652% games+2.9% vs expected
Ozzy English + Debara Ferleman4250% games+1.4% vs expected
Debara Ferleman + Rebecca Buxbaum31041% games−1.8% vs expected
Ozzy English + Julia Boneva0531% games−19.1% vs expected
Laurie Wilkins + Julia Boneva134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Wilkins + Kiera Kim224 matchesnot enough data
Janet Milam + Debara Ferleman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kiera Kim
34W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Joanne Yu
56W–65L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Rebecca Buxbaum
14W–31L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ozzy English
60W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Laurie Wilkins
66W–61L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Debara Ferleman
31W–47L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Julia Boneva
25W–43L career · 6 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
2.50
Janet Milam
4W–18L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.