Teams

Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W AM

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-11vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Wadsworth / Lynn Russo vs Sue Smith / Louise O'Reilly3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicole Mills / Lisa Caldwell vs Janice Stokes-Burns / Linda Fillmore6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNicole Mills / Lisa Caldwell vs Natalie Lindquist / Christy Owens5-7, 3-6
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Wadsworth vs Sunshine Torczon5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Wadsworth vs Cheryl Harker6-1, 6-2
2022-06-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesKalee King / Rina Benson vs Allison Leishman / Ann Trentman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.20
Jessica Schulz
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
4.01
Deyce Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.88
Carly Reese
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.87
Rina Benson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Rachel Labrum
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.81
Amy Wadsworth
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ann Hronek
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.72
Amber Greenwood
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.66
Lynn Russo
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.56
Lindsey Ramage
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.56
Angie Neuberger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Nicole Mills
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Katri Koehle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Arlene Racker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Cari Walsh
published
Lisa Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Benson + Rosa McGuire6083% games+16.7% vs expected
Lynn Russo + Rosa McGuire5256% games+11.8% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Katri Koehle2349% games+11.8% vs expected
Rachel Labrum + Carly Reese10561% games+10.4% vs expected
Amber Greenwood + Deyce Peterson5166% games+10.0% vs expected
Rina Benson + Amber Greenwood11367% games+9.9% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+8.3% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Rosa McGuire22763% games+8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Jessica Schulz
126W–50L career · 11 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Deyce Peterson
169W–42L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.01
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Carly Reese
178W–87L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Rina Benson
119W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Amy Wadsworth
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ann Hronek
65W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Amber Greenwood
154W–66L career · 10 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Lynn Russo
139W–124L career · 13 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Lindsey Ramage
186W–128L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Angie Neuberger
73W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Nicole Mills
88W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
Katri Koehle
84W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Arlene Racker
20W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Cari Walsh
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Caldwell
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.