← Search

Brian Baumgardner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Frederick, MD
4.0M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
27 matches · 5W–22L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history27 matches
W
2024-02-08 · 8.0 is Enough · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elona Novitski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-01-29 · 8.0 is Enough · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Seyler mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-22 · 8.0 is Enough · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Truax mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2021-11-21 · Harvin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Almeida mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2021-11-20 · Harvin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mesanie Lee mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2021-11-07 · Harvin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Henmueller mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-11-07 · Harvin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mesanie Lee mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-02-24 · Kim Fred 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christen Harsha mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2021-02-04 · Kim Fred 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christen Harsha mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
2021-01-16 · Kim Fred 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Baker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-01-09 · Kim Fred 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Baker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-01-07 · Kim Fred 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Pagendarm mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 42.2% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams