← Search

Mike Farrell

PORTLAND, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 38W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Farrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2025-09-07 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Ormsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-16 · SHC-Farrell/DeMoss · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-04-03 · SHC-Farrell/DeMoss · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Trank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-05 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jae Joon Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-09-14 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-06-22 · SHC-Farrell/Kang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-08 · SHC-Farrell/Kang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Heilig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-25 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anita Havemann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-04 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Roisom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-04-28 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anita Havemann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-27 · SHC-Farrell/Kang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russ DeMoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-04-07 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Korenek-Leveque mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.1% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
8.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.6% of games
9.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova