Search

Cathryn Hansen

TETONIA, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
72 matches · 55W–17L · seasons 20202025
Where Cathryn sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Cathryn is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathryn has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.0202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cathryn has gone from the 61st to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 58.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
95.7%
22W–1L · 66.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Jobe
+0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Michele Snyder
0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Karen Berky / Christina Godatchamps
2025-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Liz DelPlato
0.026below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz DelPlato
+0.012about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Birkhofer
+0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Birkhofer
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Loo Yah Leong / Kate Leatherbarrow
2025-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Kralj
+0.018better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Birkhofer
0.023about as expected — took 75% of games against 74% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Kralj
0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Liz DelPlato
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA / Erika Wilson
2024-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Penny Birkhofer
+0.055better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Kralj
+0.029better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.