← Search

Cory Purkis

Bellevue, WA
0.0 year-end
88 matches · 51W–37L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Cory Purkis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2023-05-28 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irving Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2023-05-20 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Fan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2023-05-12 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yuan Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2023-04-22 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irving Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2023-04-16 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Moosman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-04-08 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Fan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-01 · EDG-Edgers-Purkis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Cung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-03-12 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Kempf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-26 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yuan Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-27 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Hei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2023-01-20 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Cung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-01-14 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yuan Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
64.6%
31W–17L · 55.9% of games
6.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert