Search

Pamela Peters

DRIGGS, ID
0.0 year-end
49 matches · 24W–25L · seasons 20192024
Where Pamela sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Pamela is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Pamela has gone from the 53rd to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
45.5%
15W–18L · 49.3% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
2023-10-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
0.030below expectation — took 44% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2023-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-10-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Farrell
0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Vivian Olson / Jody Okamura
2023-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Ann More
0.021below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Bouton
+0.006about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Boyer
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Farrell
0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zhanbing Wu
0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-10-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Boyer
0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Bouton
0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2022-10-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
0.018about as expected — took 62% of games against 66% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.