← Search

Melissa Brandenfels

Medina, WA
0.0 year-end
58 matches · 30W–28L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Melissa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Melissa is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Melissa has gone from the 74th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 54.7% of games
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 33% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
Melody McGowan / Bonnie Flock
2023-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Bloch
−0.039below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Isabella Hashimoto / Pawitri Price
2023-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Whittier
−0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jingjing Cai
−0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanne Hasbrook
−0.064below expectation — took 14% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Heather Thorne / Cigdem Mayhew
2023-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Mathers
+0.028better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Olga Vitruk / Kathryn Geivett
2023-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Lampman
−0.051below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Takako Chavez / Jeanne Satagaj
2023-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Bloch
+0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Erin Fong / Naz Paul
2023-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Mathers
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Elizabeth Kain / Christi Nagle
2023-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Whittier
+0.042better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adina Friedman
−0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Claudiu Bulai / Monica Cretumixed
2022-11-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hasbrook
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-09-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Brandenfels
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.