Search

Virginia Nordberg

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
55 matches · 26W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
180 of 213
WA · 3.0
784 of 960

Virginia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Virginia has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Virginia has gone from the 28th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.6% of games
6.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alison Aleinikoff
0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Debra Simmonds / Nikki Juhlin
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.007about as expected — took 60% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Beth Schryer / Jill Walzer
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Dixon
+0.016better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Shannon Fitzgerald / Kathleen Dassel
2025-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.040better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Linda Greenlaw / Marilyn Pedersen
2025-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.030better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Debara Ferleman / Alina Galan
2025-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bonner
0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Bethany Haddad / Rosalind Kitikiatisak
2025-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Junghee Kim
0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Svetlana Petculescu / Deanna Thompson
2025-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wilke
0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Erin Vikstrom / Wanda Garfield
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Cardinal
0.012below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaji Dyson
0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Blaikie
0.028below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.