← Search

Whit Crump

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 55W–25L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Whit Crump to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2024-08-09 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Gregory mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-07-27 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Gregory mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-03 · MI-Goodman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mayoor Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-04 · MI-Goodman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Mastan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-12-03 · MI-Martin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ildi Koves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2023-10-22 · MI-Martin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shamayal Jawed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-10-08 · MI-Martin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2023-07-29 · MI-Rock Lobsters-Holland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Crump mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-04 · MI-B Team-Briggs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gaberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-02-11 · MI-B Team-Briggs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2023-01-29 · MI-B Team-Briggs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gaberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-11-05 · MI-Thunen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
15W–5L · 59.7% of games
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 58.2% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert