Search

Samantha Good

BURIEN, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
64 matches · 42W–22L · seasons 20192025
Where Samantha sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Samantha is one of 1052 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Samantha has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Samantha has gone from the 65th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.3% of games
4.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson
0.016below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Miller
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson
0.061below expectation — took 25% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Miller
0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 2-2
L
2023-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson
0.030below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson
0.013below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Dickinson
+0.041better than expected — took 56% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Samantha Good - *
2023-01-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0 · with Cecile Delafield
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-2
L
2022-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Isarankura
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Isarankura
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dustin Hedger
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2022-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tuan Nguyen
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.