← Search

Asaf BenHani

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
74 matches · 44W–30L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Asaf sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Asaf is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Asaf has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5201920212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Asaf has gone from the 88th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 61.3% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.7% of games
6.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
Shellene Goudge / Carlos Aguirremixed
2023-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Morrison
+0.000better than expected — took 29% of games against 24% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Tanya Hale / Dan Halemixed
2023-02-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anjanette Bixel
+0.000better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kay Higer / Charles Sungmixed
2023-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Morrison
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jay Hu / Yan Uyenomixed
2023-01-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anjanette Bixel
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 27% expected
3-0
W
2022-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Brandon
+0.025better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Ryan Popowcer / Shane Harley
2022-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Tricca
+0.053better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Michael Bauwens / Luke Odon
2022-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Brandon
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Matthew Cox / Matthew Paglia
2022-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carter Heller
+0.017about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carter Heller
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Darin McKinney / James Smiley
2022-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Igou
+0.025better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Brigitte Fallon / Dan Michalskimixed
2022-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natasha Kattau
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Gene Lonardo / Daniel Vaughn
2022-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carter Heller
−0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.