Search

Ciara Rivera

HENDERSON, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
100 matches · 41W–59L · seasons 20202026
Where Ciara sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Ciara is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ciara has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ciara has gone from the 2nd to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 49.2% of games
4.0
30.8%
12W–27L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.8% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-03-21 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.067below expectation — took 0% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Lea Cohen
2026-03-14 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Bing Zou / Chad Alligoodmixed
2025-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Luna
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Marie Jocelyne Pink / Anahi Sanchez
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Ng
0.019below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Murphy
0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Audrey Chin / Nathaniel Yostmixed
2025-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with JJ Fuller
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevan Ommen
0.067below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Marcy Saxe / Anna Bishop
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Back
+0.008about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Lucy Twohy / Taylor Heinzmixed
2024-09-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Riley Stahley
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-09-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Riley Stahley
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-09-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Back
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.