← Search

Emma Scherzer

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 21W–6L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Emma Scherzer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2025-08-23 · Emma Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-08-16 · Emma Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-04 · Emma Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-24 · Emma Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-07-19 · Emma Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-05 · Emma Leahy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-03-17 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-03-03 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-02-10 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2024-02-03 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-07-23 · Chapman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Gram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Ann-Marie Lundberg / Rachel Nies
2023-07-17 · Chapman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeleine Bourland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 60.6% of games
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 67.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 52% of the time
#1 Singles
52%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal