Search

Emma Scherzer

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
27 matches · 21W–6L · seasons 20222025
Where Emma sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Emma is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams4 teams · 2022–2024
MAC-Risch
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2024
MAC-Harrington
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2023
Chapman
2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women
2023
MAC-Mangan
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emma has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 60.6% of games
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 67.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history27 matches
W
2025-08-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.009better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-04 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.082below expectation — took 25% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.046better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-07-19 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Riley Hategan
2024-03-17 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-03-03 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-02-10 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.045better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Athena Rubin
2024-02-03 · MAC-Risch · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.104better than expected — took 100% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-07-23 · Chapman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Gram
0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-07-17 · Chapman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madeleine Bourland
+0.044better than expected — took 55% of games against 36% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.