← Search

Tim Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
KENILWORTH, IL
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
11 matches · 7W–4L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-03-15 · CDTA W 55&OM7.0 8.HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Leonardo
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-04-14 · CDTA W TriX60/70/80 3.Centennial Lund Sun 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Manolis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-04-07 · CDTA W TriX60/70/80 3.Centennial Lund Sun 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tanja Boskovic mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-20 · CDTA W TriX60/70/80 3.Centennial Lund Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth David mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-01-14 · CDTA W TriX60/70/80 3.Centennial Lund Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Wittman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Cassier mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Peck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-12-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
L
2022-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rochelle Probst mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-10-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-07-27 · CDTA S M40&O 7.0X Tam Paterakos Mon 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Hahn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams