Search

Andrea Olson

Snohomish, WA
0.0 year-end
82 matches · 61W–21L · seasons 20192022
Where Andrea sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Andrea is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrea has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Andrea has gone from the 71st to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
5.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 57% of games
10.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 62.7% of games
9.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
L
2022-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chotika Wannachinda
0.020below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erika Takeuchi
0.043below expectation — took 50% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carmen Blanco
0.004about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chotika Wannachinda
+0.023better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2022-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chotika Wannachinda
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jake Hoelting / Erin Nicholschamps
2021-10-30 · #3 Doubles · with Roman Kravchuk
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Kazumi Negishi / Jillian Santoschamps
2021-10-29 · #1 Doubles · with Roman Kravchuk
0.054below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2021-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Hou
+0.082better than expected — took 71% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Tanya O'Neil / Richard Sabochamps
2021-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Hou
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jack Wang / Paige Polizoischamps
2021-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Roman Kravchuk
0.012below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Mark Ball / Leigh Anne Dunkinmixed
2021-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Will Blanchard
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kristin Gibson / Blakeley Bean
2021-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Pernilla Putnik
+0.015better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.