← Search

Jill Chapman

HAPPY VALLEY, OR
0.0 year-end
39 matches · 16W–23L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Jill sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jill is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been 4.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jill has gone from the 51st to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.4% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
L
2021-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Kristen Benkstein
−0.013below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2021-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Findley
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
−0.060below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2021-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Findley
−0.027below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Crosby
−0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
−0.011below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2021-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
−0.079below expectation — took 20% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2020-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
−0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2020-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Boon Yon Joung
−0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2019-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Tully
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Heidi Affentranger / Martin Jeffrey Binnsmixed
2019-09-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Tully
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2019-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bruce Levelle
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.