Search

Sarah Kaufman

Vancouver, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
43 matches · 31W–12L · seasons 20202025
Where Sarah sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sarah is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams13 teams · 2020–2025
VTC-Won
2025 Coed 18-39 · 8.0 Coed Combo
2025
CGM-Blunt/Palena
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
CGM-Rushall
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2024
CGM Love All
2024 One Doubles · 4.0 Women
2024
CGM-Wasu/Geisler
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2024
VTC-Jones
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02020202120232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.1% of games
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 58.5% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
L
2025-02-02 · VTC-Won · #1 Female Doubles · 8.0 · with Samantha Williams
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-5
W
2024-07-27 · CGM Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Williams
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-11 · CGM Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Williams
+0.026better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-07-02 · CGM Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Rushall
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-06-30 · CGM Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Williams
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Alix Edwards / Davis Wilkinsonmixed
2023-11-11 · CGM-Wasu/Geisler · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Clancy
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 20% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2023-10-28 · CGM-Rushall · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Arlen Britt
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-10-15 · CGM-Rushall · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Arlen Britt
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-10-07 · CGM-Blunt/Palena · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karl Kropp
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-10-01 · CGM-Wasu/Geisler · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aman Wasu
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Rebecca Yu / Adam Okenmixed
2023-09-16 · CGM-Wasu/Geisler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Clancy
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-09-16 · CGM-Blunt/Palena · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Geisler
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.