← Search

ELMA DALLAL

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
73 matches · 33W–40L · seasons 2019–2023
Where ELMA sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

ELMA is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

ELMA has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, ELMA has gone from the 38th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 48.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 33% of games
7.0
60%
15W–10L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
2023-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karrie Bennallack
−0.003about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Michelle Beckwith / Susan Grady
2023-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karrie Bennallack
−0.009below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Diane Paull / Janet Spelman
2023-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hilary Vincent-Philpot
−0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen McDaniel
−0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2022-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Holland
+0.003better than expected — took 100% of games against 82% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Val Froman
−0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Val Froman
+0.027better than expected — took 61% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-10-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Val Froman
−0.062below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-09-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Val Froman
+0.026better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
EMELIA ALLEN / Sunny Glendon
2022-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Cardenas
−0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Linda English / Mimi Fumo
2022-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Cook
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Dawn Anderson / Denise Mandelbaum
2022-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Caruso
+0.012about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.