← Search

Nikki Emord

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2023
59 matches · 28W–31L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Nikki sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Nikki is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams16 teams · 2014–2022
SPANISH TRAIL
2022 Usta Adult League 18 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER
2022
SPANISH TRAIL
2022 Nta Adult Fall League · 3.5 WOMEN
2022
SPANISH TRAIL #1
2021 Usta Adult League 18 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER
2021
SPANISH TRAIL
2021 Nta Adult Fall League · 3.5 WOMEN
2021
SPANISH TRAIL #1
2020 Nta Adult Fall League · 3.5 WOMEN
2020
SPANISH TRAIL
2019 Usta Adult League 18 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nikki has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Nikki has gone from the 79th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
47.5%
28W–31L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
L
Cynthia Zanzig / Kelly Maier
2022-12-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cappi Bates
+0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Dana Deluce / Sarah Merwin
2022-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Rusk
−0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-11-19 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.029below expectation — took 62% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Melanie Schwiesow / Mari Valvo
2022-11-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cappi Bates
+0.023better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Stetts
−0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Stetts
+0.047better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Khelifi
+0.014about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aida Shirley
−0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2022-10-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Casovan
+0.012better than expected — took 68% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Marijo Peterson / Diana Ebel
2022-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Khelifi
−0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.037below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Kari Allen
2022-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.043better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.