← Search

Melissa Edwards

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 16W–12L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history28 matches
L
2023-08-06 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Antonisse-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ignacio Arretche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-07-30 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Antonisse-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ignacio Arretche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-23 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Antonisse-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Kuehn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-12 · MSIL 4.0W A40&O Jackson/Tracy-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Jackson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-07-02 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Antonisse-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2023-06-21 · MSIL 4.0W A40&O Jackson/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Coverstone
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-24 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Novitsky
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-05-17 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Novitsky
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2022-10-30 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Scaggs
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-30 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Scaggs
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-10-23 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-10-02 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Scaggs
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 51.3% of games
4.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 50.4% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert