Teams

Team 8 Gerilynn Sanders 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesBrenda Howard / Margrit Bazan vs Jennifer Kinson / Jennifer Smiley6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Bransky / Gerilynn Sanders vs Amaya Yabar / Mandy Curtis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Esteve / Dina Maldonado vs Michelle Hudak / Elizabeth Wayland6-4, 6-1
2026-08-22vs Team 4 Cindy Graham 6.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPriya Chacko / Grisel Diaz vs Amy Cox / Lindsey Hudgins1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Schneiderman / Gerilynn Sanders vs Anne French / LeAnne Ray2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Esteve / Dina Maldonado vs Aubrey Kennedy / Heather Jordan4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesBrenda Howard / Margrit Bazan vs Aileen Soare / Sheila MacHado6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPriya Chacko / Grisel Diaz vs Lily Huang / Kelle Hinson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Bransky / Gerilynn Sanders vs Michelle Cox / Miriam Alejandro3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-20vs Team 20 Lindsey Starnes 6.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPriya Chacko / Grisel Diaz vs Lindsey Starnes / Elizabeth Rainey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrenda Howard / Margrit Bazan vs Shannon DeVilbiss / Amy Marable2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGerilynn Sanders / Amy Schneiderman vs Erin Basden / Chelsey Horkey2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Adrienne Bransky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Margrit Bazan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Gerilynn Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Grisel Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Amy Schneiderman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Dina Maldonado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Priya Chacko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerilynn Sanders + Margrit Bazan3254% gamesnot enough data
Gerilynn Sanders + Grisel Diaz224 matchesnot enough data
Priya Chacko + Grisel Diaz123 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Bransky + Gerilynn Sanders033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adrienne Bransky
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Margrit Bazan
31W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
Gerilynn Sanders
48W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Grisel Diaz
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3.5
Amy Schneiderman
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Dina Maldonado
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Priya Chacko
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.