Teams

Team 11 Jana Reist 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs Team 7 Christine Slote 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Holford / Ashley Ostrowicki vs Avery Cording / Melissa Bell7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Harris / Leanne Moore vs OLIA BOSOVIK / Lorri Vaughn6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMeredith Foster / Cari Jackson vs Jo Alamares / Aesun Park4-6, 5-7
2026-08-22vs Team 19 Sumesh Chopra 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesJana Reist / Leanne Moore vs Karen Eubanks / Jackie Truong6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Mulkey / Lauren Johnson vs Julie Richard / Susan Guthrie6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Devinney / Cari Jackson vs Jennifer Mooney / Keisha Horton6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMitzi Tsukahara / Emily Mulkey vs Tammi Cole / Chelsea Northam6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Newman / Meredith Foster vs Adrienne Roberts / Lidia Dattalo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKim Holford / Amber Newman vs Joanie Buster / Annie Rohde2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Devinney / Ashley Ostrowicki vs Donna Bickerstaff / Veronica Esquino7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJana Reist / Mitzi Tsukahara vs Julie Altenau / Jackie Allen - Berkowitz7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Kim Holford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jana Reist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Emily Mulkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Ashley Ostrowicki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Mitzi Tsukahara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Amber Newman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Leanne Moore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Cari Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Laura Devinney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitzi Tsukahara + Emily Mulkey6360% games+7.6% vs expected
Jana Reist + Kim Holford5159% gamesnot enough data
Jana Reist + Mitzi Tsukahara303 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Moore + Cari Jackson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Holford
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jana Reist
32W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Emily Mulkey
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Ashley Ostrowicki
17W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Mitzi Tsukahara
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Amber Newman
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
Leanne Moore
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Cari Jackson
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Laura Devinney
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.