Teams

Team 10 Jill Fain/Brenda Bingham 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesJennifer Deaton / Kim Chi Phillips vs Ana Goridkov / Jazmine Urquhart5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Fritz / Allison Leeper vs Helen Tongai Ward / Gemela Lewis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Fain / Lauren Sorden vs Joan Thorne / Rhonda Askew7-5, 5-2
2026-08-22vs Team 18 Whitney Tucker 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Leeper / Amanda Fritz vs Dyana Taylor / Jenn Iraheta2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Bingham / Kim Chi Phillips vs Deseree Ceniza / Lisa Tran6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJill Fain / Jennifer OCarroll vs Whitney Tucker / Countess Dudley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAllison Leeper / Amanda Fritz vs Morgan Kaplan / Michelle Sowards6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Deaton / Jennifer OCarroll vs Tina Hoang / Natalie Weatherford7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Fain / Kirsten Lile vs Annette Hedblom / Alyssa Tanis7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Team 14 Elizabeth George 6.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Deaton / Kim Chi Phillips vs Ami McCann / Leticia Martin6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrenda Bingham / Jennifer OCarroll vs Elizabeth George / Heidi Aiken3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Fain / Lauren Sorden vs Milensky Rega / Taylor Klepsch6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Brenda Bingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jill Fain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Jennifer Deaton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Allison Leeper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Amanda Fritz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Kirsten Lile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer OCarroll
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Sorden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Deaton + Brenda Bingham6058% games+7.5% vs expected
Allison Leeper + Amanda Fritz123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Deaton + Jill Fain123 matchesnot enough data
Jill Fain + Lauren Sorden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Bingham
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Jill Fain
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Jennifer Deaton
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Allison Leeper
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Amanda Fritz
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
Kirsten Lile
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
Jennifer OCarroll
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Sorden
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.