Teams

Team 14 Elizabeth George 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesNicole Roshto / Tomoko Tanabe vs Leigh Causey / Alyssa Tanis6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth George / Taylor Klepsch vs Tara Cresto / Natalie Weatherford0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmi McCann / Leticia Martin vs Morgan Kaplan / Annette Delbridge6-4, 6-4
2026-08-21vs Team 18 Whitney Tucker 6.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Sykes / Cindy Chiou vs Dyana Taylor / Jenn Iraheta3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Roshto / Tomoko Tanabe vs Marlene Holmes / Lisa Tran3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth George / Milensky Rega vs Deseree Ceniza / Susan George0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSharon Sykes / Milensky Rega vs Gemela Lewis / Helen Tongai Ward3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth George / Natalie Sorrell vs Jazmine Urquhart / Ana Goridkov2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Roshto / Tomoko Tanabe vs Rhonda Askew / Spiwe Dube6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAmi McCann / Leticia Martin vs Jennifer Deaton / Kim Chi Phillips3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMilensky Rega / Taylor Klepsch vs Jill Fain / Lauren Sorden4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Tomoko Tanabe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Heidi Aiken
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Nicole Roshto
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Milensky Rega
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Natalie Sorrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Cindy Chiou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Taylor Klepsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Ami McCann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Tonya Ball
published
2.90
Sharon Sykes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Klepsch + Nicole Roshto5170% games+16.6% vs expected
Ami McCann + Tomoko Tanabe3250% gamesnot enough data
Tomoko Tanabe + Nicole Roshto4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tomoko Tanabe
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
Heidi Aiken
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Nicole Roshto
32W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Milensky Rega
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Natalie Sorrell
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cindy Chiou
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Taylor Klepsch
26W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Ami McCann
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tonya Ball
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Sharon Sykes
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.