Teams

Team 4 Cindy Graham 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesAubrey Kennedy / Valbona Martin vs Aileen Soare / Andrea Montuori6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLea Ellsworth / Heather Jordan vs Lily Huang / Kelle Hinson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMorgan Baker / Amy Cox vs Estela Zodrow / Sheila MacHado6-4, 6-1
2026-08-22vs Team 8 Gerilynn Sanders 6.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Cox / Lindsey Hudgins vs Priya Chacko / Grisel Diaz6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne French / LeAnne Ray vs Amy Schneiderman / Gerilynn Sanders2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAubrey Kennedy / Heather Jordan vs Maria Esteve / Dina Maldonado6-4, 6-0
2026-08-21vs Team 20 Lindsey Starnes 6.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Cox / Lindsey Hudgins vs Leigh Ann Griffin / Amy Marable6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAubrey Kennedy / LeAnne Ray vs Morgan Farrow / Chelsey Horkey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLea Ellsworth / Heather Jordan vs Tracye Kenney / Michelle Hudak5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Graham / Valbona Martin vs Kim Ashmore / Alison Allen6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Amy Cox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Aubrey Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Lea Ellsworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Cindy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Valbona Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Heather Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
LeAnne Ray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kelly Killinger
published
Lindsey Hudgins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrey Kennedy + Kelly Killinger4265% games+19.2% vs expected
Cindy Graham + Lea Ellsworth4257% games+6.2% vs expected
Cindy Graham + Kelly Killinger9075% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Killinger + Lea Ellsworth5077% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Graham + Aubrey Kennedy213 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Graham + Valbona Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Jordan + Lea Ellsworth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Cox
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Aubrey Kennedy
43W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Lea Ellsworth
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cindy Graham
34W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Valbona Martin
25W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Heather Jordan
31W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
LeAnne Ray
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
Kelly Killinger
31W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Hudgins
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.