Teams

Team 5 Teri Wilson/Sarah Montgomery 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs Team 9 Alexandra Villamarin 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Bradley / Abby Powell vs Serap Karayigen / Jennifer Craft6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTeri Wilson / Kelly Hager vs Silvana Velazquez Vivanco / Alexandra Villamarin1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDebra Driscoll / Jennifer Kinder vs Amy Russo / Adreon Morgan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJulie Bradley / Angela Looney vs Angie Wood / Abbey Maus0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Morefield / Abby Powell vs Maddy Schwartz / Elvia Jordan4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Driscoll / Natalie Carey vs Casey Christian / Shannon Martin2-6, 4-6
2026-08-21vs Team 13 Gerry OBrien 6.5WWon 20
W#2 DoublesTeri Wilson / Kelly Hager vs Deanna Harp / April Scopa6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJill Chris / Jennifer Kinder vs Linda Potts / Nicole Peer6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Team 17 Tina Kimbell 6.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Morefield / Abby Powell vs Tina Kimbell / Ida Gleaton6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAundi Henderson / Angela Looney vs Sarah Charles / Jill Scovell2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Montgomery / Debra Driscoll vs Niki Leete / Chelsea Bailey0-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Teri Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Debra Driscoll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Jill Chris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Amber Morefield
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Aundi Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Abby Powell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Angela Looney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Jennifer Kinder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kelly Hager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Wilson
37W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Debra Driscoll
68W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jill Chris
25W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Amber Morefield
26W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Aundi Henderson
24W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Abby Powell
45W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Angela Looney
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Jennifer Kinder
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kelly Hager
36W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.