Teams

Team 17 Tina Kimbell 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs Team 9 Alexandra Villamarin 6.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLacy Bain / Kate Dorff vs Silvana Velazquez Vivanco / Monica Vivanco7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Charles / Katie Pearson vs Yeasil Park / Allison Allen6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNiki Leete / Diane Josephakis vs Adreon Morgan / Amy Russo1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTina Kimbell / Chelsea Bailey vs Lillian Ryan / Elvia Jordan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Charles / Katie Pearson vs Susan Coy / Sheridan Lang0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLacy Bain / Diane Josephakis vs Mariana Villalba / Rebecca Scott0-6, 2-6
2026-08-21vs Team 13 Gerry OBrien 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesTina Kimbell / Ida Gleaton vs Amy Flowers / Nicole Peer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNiki Leete / Jill Scovell vs Linda Potts / Jennifer Mays4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLacy Bain / Jennie Hornbaker vs Cathy Langland / Dawn Goodrich6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTina Kimbell / Ida Gleaton vs Amber Morefield / Abby Powell3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Charles / Jill Scovell vs Aundi Henderson / Angela Looney6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNiki Leete / Chelsea Bailey vs Sarah Montgomery / Debra Driscoll5-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Lacy Bain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Tina Kimbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Katie Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Sarah Charles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Ida Gleaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Niki Leete
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Jill Scovell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kate Dorff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Jennie Hornbaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Diane Josephakis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Charles + Niki Leete123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacy Bain
25W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Tina Kimbell
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Katie Pearson
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Sarah Charles
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Ida Gleaton
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Niki Leete
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jill Scovell
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Kate Dorff
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Jennie Hornbaker
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Diane Josephakis
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.