Teams

Team 6 Gemela Lewis/Jazmine Urquhart 6.5W

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 6.5W

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesAna Goridkov / Jazmine Urquhart vs Jennifer Deaton / Kim Chi Phillips7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHelen Tongai Ward / Gemela Lewis vs Amanda Fritz / Allison Leeper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoan Thorne / Rhonda Askew vs Jill Fain / Lauren Sorden5-7, 2-5
W#1 DoublesAna Goridkov / Jazmine Urquhart vs Annette Hedblom / Michelle Sowards6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoan Thorne / Spiwe Dube vs Catherine Delaney / Courtney Holland2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGemela Lewis / Stephanie Cullors vs Tara Cresto / Kim Miller3-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs Team 14 Elizabeth George 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesGemela Lewis / Helen Tongai Ward vs Sharon Sykes / Milensky Rega6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJazmine Urquhart / Ana Goridkov vs Elizabeth George / Natalie Sorrell6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRhonda Askew / Spiwe Dube vs Nicole Roshto / Tomoko Tanabe0-6, 2-6
2026-08-20vs Team 18 Whitney Tucker 6.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Tongai Ward / Gemela Lewis vs Whitney Tucker / Jenn Iraheta7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRhonda Askew / Stephanie Cullors vs Dyana Taylor / Susan George2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJazmine Urquhart / Joan Thorne vs Marlene Holmes / Countess Dudley2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 6.5W
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Helen Tongai Ward
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Ana Goridkov
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Joan Thorne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gemela Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jazmine Urquhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Askew
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Spiwe Dube
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Cullors
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gemela Lewis + Jazmine Urquhart3448% gamesnot enough data
Helen Tongai Ward + Gemela Lewis303 matchesnot enough data
Joan Thorne + Spiwe Dube123 matchesnot enough data
Jazmine Urquhart + Ana Goridkov303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Helen Tongai Ward
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Ana Goridkov
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Joan Thorne
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Gemela Lewis
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jazmine Urquhart
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Askew
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Spiwe Dube
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Cullors
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.