Teams

CDTA S 18&O 4.0W Tam Corey Mon 7 $22

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

18 players · average NTRP 4.04 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesErin Alvarez vs Monique Melnick7-6, 0-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSue Wissing / Gail Wilson vs Jill Rudman / Tracy Gabriel6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Sally Washlow2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Davis / Julie Weidner vs Farrah Zick / Susan Morris5-7, 4-2, 0-1
2022-07-11Won 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Eileen Lee vs Heidi Nickel / Lisa Hans7-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Angela Hanson vs Karen Kooperman / Kathleen Sullivan6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesChristine Meade / Elizabeth Quigley vs Judy Morgan / Johanna Raimond6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErin Alvarez vs Kelly Castriotta6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Rebecca Daly vs Cheryl Imo / Shannon Carroll2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Lee vs Amanda Fishleder6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSue Wissing / Eileen Lee vs Rosemary Wheeler / Rebecca Kosner6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Lee vs Svetlana Petrova6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Hanson / Martha Davis vs Kathy Loria / Nora Errico6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesErin Alvarez vs Michele Marx6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Rebecca Daly vs Sheila Bondoc / Cara Waddle4-6, 2-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 4.0W Tam Corey Mon 7 $226027312178
2CDTA S 18&O 4.0W McFetridge Lund Sat 3 $2051191124207
3CDTA S 18&O 4.0W MT Bann Giertsen Wed 6:30 $2551181231262
4CDTA S 18&O 4.0W Centennial Nemec Thurs 7 $2042161431237
5CDTA S 18&O 4.0W MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $2533191126199
6CDTA S 18&O 4.0W Heritage Chmieleski Thurs 6:30 $2124111942297
7CDTA S 18&O 4.0W College Park E Zick Wed 6:30 $2224121845289
8CDTA S 18&O 4.0W Glenbrook Turdo Tues 6:30 $2515121841277
9CDTA S 18&O 4.0W MT Bann (Out) Ewaldz Wed 6:30 $251592144297
10CDTA S 18&O 4.0W McFetridge Newson Sun 1 $201572347308
11(DROPPED) CDTA S 18&O 4.0W Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $26000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erin Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Michelle Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.11
Christine Meade
published 4.5
3.95
Dawn Baumann
published 4
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Jean Soh
published 4
Gail Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Eileen Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Teodora Varcheva
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.61
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Sue Wissing
published 4
3.56
Martha Davis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Angela Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Rebecca Daly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Soh + Maria Lobo-Corey6458% games+15.0% vs expected
Stephanie Thompson + Masako Ueda9165% games+11.0% vs expected
Christine Meade + Angela Hanson18859% games+10.5% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Julie Weidner11260% games+8.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Christine Meade12562% games+7.4% vs expected
Martha Davis + Michelle Lee12563% games+7.3% vs expected
Jean Soh + Silvia Kusaka15264% games+7.3% vs expected
Christine Meade + Julie Weidner7259% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Alvarez
45W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Lee
167W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Christine Meade
279W–180L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Jean Soh
468W–283L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Quigley
103W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Eileen Lee
136W–123L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Teodora Varcheva
103W–129L career · 1 line in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Stephanie Thompson
146W–154L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Sue Wissing
64W–48L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Martha Davis
349W–162L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Angela Hanson
119W–137L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Rebecca Daly
129W–147L career · 2 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.