Teams

CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.0W Tam Corey Sun 1 $20

CDTA ESL 18 & Over W · E

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 SinglesMichelle Lee vs Ruth Karakosta6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEileen Lee / Julie Weidner vs Noreen Ohcana / Kimberly Horberg6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Elizabeth Quigley vs Sally Washlow / Sarah Murfey6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Lee vs Svetlana Petrova6-4, 3-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEileen Lee / Sue Wissing vs Kathy Loria / Roxana Aleksic5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lee / Eileen Lee vs Colleen Doyle / Leslie Weinger6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Daly vs Elizabeth Rogers6-4, 4-5
W#3 DoublesGail Wilson / Masako Ueda vs Sheila Spade / Rocio Hoerr6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichelle Lee vs Emily Shamrock3-6, 6-5
W#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Eileen Lee vs Lisa Hans / KAREN MAJERCZAK7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Hanson / Martha Davis vs Laurie Gray / Alison Donnelly3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lee / Eileen Lee vs Patti Charman / Lynne Sakanich6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Weidner / Silvia Kusaka vs AnneMarie Geary / Rochelle Meng4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Eileen Lee vs Rachael Gruen / Jacqueline Dawkins6-0, 7-6
L#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Eileen Lee vs Andrea Hesser / Beth Gilmore7-5, 5-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Lee vs Britt Hughes6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Silvia Kusaka vs Jessica Arnold / Emily Emmerman6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAngela Hanson / Christine Meade vs Penelope Trowbridge / Elizabeth Berry6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesEileen Lee / Julie Weidner vs Marjorie Gaitan / Sallie Mehrtens6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRebecca Daly vs Juliann Abderholden6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lee / Martha Davis vs Laura Purcell / Alja Hessami-Maas6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJean Soh / Rebecca Daly vs Keara Miller / Lida Downey4-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Kathy Kasiurak vs Alexandria Kotoch / Cate Brodner7-5, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMichelle Lee / Martha Davis vs Erin Alvarez / Cheryl Imo6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Baumann / Eileen Lee vs LorRhonda Miller / Kim Johnson Flodin7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGail Wilson / Silvia Kusaka vs Jean Sawin / Maura Starshak6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · E
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Michelle Lee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
4.11
Christine Meade
published 4.5
3.95
Dawn Baumann
published 4
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.82
Jean Soh
published 4
Gail Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Eileen Lee
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.61
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.59
Sue Wissing
published 4
3.56
Martha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Angela Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Rebecca Daly
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.06
Elizabeth Cassier
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Soh + Maria Lobo-Corey6458% games+15.0% vs expected
Stephanie Thompson + Masako Ueda9165% games+11.0% vs expected
Christine Meade + Angela Hanson18859% games+10.5% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Julie Weidner11260% games+8.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Christine Meade12562% games+7.4% vs expected
Martha Davis + Michelle Lee12563% games+7.3% vs expected
Jean Soh + Silvia Kusaka15264% games+7.3% vs expected
Christine Meade + Julie Weidner7259% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Lee
167W–74L career · 8 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Christine Meade
279W–180L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Jean Soh
468W–283L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Quigley
103W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Eileen Lee
136W–123L career · 9 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Stephanie Thompson
146W–154L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Sue Wissing
64W–48L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Martha Davis
349W–162L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Angela Hanson
119W–137L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Rebecca Daly
129W–147L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Elizabeth Cassier
71W–139L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.