Teams

Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberrySplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesTammy Petersen / Nanette Brockbank vs Jill Ford / Sherilyn Rawlings1-6, 4-6
W#3 Female DoublesMindy Christofferson / Robyn Davis vs Shelli Johnston / Taylor Kirk6-4, 2-3, 1-0
2023-12-07vs Sports Mall-AffleckWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAngie Haskins / Heather Allen vs Michelle Reynolds / JaNae Smith6-2, 6-5
2023-11-30vs RISE AC-GlinesLost 12
L#1 Female SinglesEmily Jarvie vs Jaime Vance1-6, 5-6
L#2 Female DoublesNicole Holland / Cara Hassey vs Becky Thompson / Jennifer Jensen6-3, 4-5, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesSharlene Enloe / Nanette Brockbank vs Elizabeth Geldmacher / Mary Menlove6-3, 6-1
2023-11-16vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesNicole Holland / Emily Jarvie vs Faith Petersen / AMy Huish7-5, 2-3, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesJana Fairbanks / Nanette Brockbank vs Lisa OBrien / Megan Rusconi6-3, 6-5
2023-11-09vs Sunpro-Leishman/MortensenLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesNicole Miller / Mindy Christofferson vs Andy Torres / Jennifer Granum5-7, 3-2, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesSharlene Enloe / Angie Haskins vs Halli Craft / Jill Ford1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Lisa Bullington
published
3.76
Angela Bleak
published 4
3.74
Nicole Holland
published
3.74
Sharlene Enloe
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Lori Murdock
published
3.69
Nanette Brockbank
usually #2 Female Doubles 33%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Leah Lambert
published
3.64
Trista Willardson
published
3.61
Angie Haskins
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Emily Jarvie
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 4
3.57
Jana Fairbanks
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Mindy Christofferson
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Cara Hassey
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Tammy Petersen
published
3.41
Heather Jensen
published
3.39
3.38
Nicole Miller
published
3.38
Lori Taylor
published
3.37
Jamie Price
published
3.34
Heather Allen
published
Robyn Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Bullington + Mindy Christofferson5070% games+9.5% vs expected
Jamie Price + Lisa Bullington10459% games+6.5% vs expected
Jana Fairbanks + Lisa Bullington5459% games+6.4% vs expected
Angie Haskins + Mindy Christofferson7752% games+6.3% vs expected
Nicole Holland + Emily Jarvie241156% games+4.4% vs expected
Trista Willardson + Nanette Brockbank5355% games+4.0% vs expected
Lisa Bullington + Nanette Brockbank9657% games+3.9% vs expected
Heather Jensen + Mindy Christofferson5453% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Bullington
115W–44L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Nicole Holland
54W–34L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Sharlene Enloe
120W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
Lori Murdock
72W–24L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Nanette Brockbank
79W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Leah Lambert
45W–59L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Trista Willardson
66W–43L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Angie Haskins
92W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Emily Jarvie
51W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Jana Fairbanks
48W–52L career · 1 line in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Mindy Christofferson
68W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Cara Hassey
47W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Tammy Petersen
40W–55L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Heather Jensen
44W–103L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
4
Christine Neeleman
28W–44L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
Nicole Miller
67W–106L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lori Taylor
38W–57L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Jamie Price
45W–55L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
Heather Allen
62W–69L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
Robyn Davis
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.