Teams

Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

15 players · average NTRP 4.05 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesRina Benson / Nicole Mills vs Lindsey Ramage / Alessandra Nolan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesDeyce Peterson vs Sarah Alton6-0, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesCarly Reese / Heather Probst vs Shannon Shepherd / Shauna Carter4-6, 5-3, 1-0
2023-12-07vs Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/GardnerLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesMandy Berg / Amber Greenwood vs Holli Turner / Kathy Miller-Rees2-6, 5-1, 0-1
W#2 Female DoublesDeyce Peterson / Rosa McGuire vs Lisa Hakes / Christine Littleford7-5, 3-4, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesHeidi Clark / Carly Reese vs Sara Green / Alli Gardner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-11-30vs Liberty Park-Jones/MoretonWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesDeyce Peterson / Mandy Berg vs Janice Stokes-Burns / Aimee Nilson6-3, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesAnn Hronek / Carly Reese vs Jennifer Moreton / Shauna Lake6-2, 6-1
2023-11-16vs Liberty Park Tennis-Young/SwensenLost 13
L#1 Female DoublesDeyce Peterson / Heather Probst vs Amy Earl / Christine Fotheringham7-6, 0-2, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesCarly Reese vs Annette Knight6-3, 6-2
L#2 Female DoublesRina Benson / Amber Greenwood vs Emily Benton / Jessica Gardner5-7, 3-5
L#3 Female DoublesMandy Berg / Lisa Caldwell vs Gretel Sampson / Dalynn Thomas5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-11-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-RasmussenWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesRina Benson / Angie Neuberger vs Ashley Phyfe / Christine Lee6-1, 6-5
W#1 Female SinglesCarly Reese vs Jan Chamberlain6-2, 6-5
W#2 Female DoublesRachel Ray / Rachel Labrum vs Christina Baer / Marsha Elmore7-5, 3-4, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesRosa McGuire / Mandy Berg vs Kim Halladay / Courtnee Poelman6-2, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Jessica Schulz
published
4.00
Deyce Peterson
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Heather Probst
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Mandy Berg
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Rina Benson
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Carly Reese
usually #1 Female Singles 40%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Rachel Labrum
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
Ann Hronek
published 4
3.70
Amber Greenwood
published 4
3.55
Angie Neuberger
published 4
3.52
Nicole Mills
published
Heidi Clark
published
Lisa Caldwell
published
Rachel Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Benson + Rosa McGuire6083% games+17.3% vs expected
Rachel Labrum + Carly Reese10561% games+12.3% vs expected
Carly Reese + Heather Probst8167% games+11.2% vs expected
Amber Greenwood + Deyce Peterson5166% games+9.9% vs expected
Rina Benson + Amber Greenwood11367% games+8.3% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Rosa McGuire24763% games+7.3% vs expected
Rachel Labrum + Heather Probst8263% games+7.2% vs expected
Amber Greenwood + Heidi Clark161157% games+5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Jessica Schulz
131W–50L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
4.15
4
Deyce Peterson
169W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Heather Probst
114W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Rina Benson
119W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Carly Reese
178W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Ann Hronek
67W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Amber Greenwood
155W–67L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Angie Neuberger
75W–76L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Nicole Mills
91W–73L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Heidi Clark
49W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Caldwell
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Ray
65W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.