← Search

Shelley Laurance

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 18W–13L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history31 matches
W
2025-07-11 · WHRC-Ottesen/Zagunis · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Ottesen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-08-16 · WHRC-MacPherson/Capello · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carol Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-07-15 · WHRC-MacPherson/Capello · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Marlene Huntsinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-10 · WHRC-Zagunis/Van Gasse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy van Gasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-05-03 · WHRC-Zagunis/Van Gasse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy van Gasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-04 · WHRC-Zagunis/Van Gasse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy van Gasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-28 · WHRC-Zagunis/Van Gasse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy van Gasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-17 · WHRC-MacPherson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Barb Foster
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
Carole Luckett / Margaret Huck
2023-08-04 · WHRC-MacPherson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cathy Zagunis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
Mary Mountain / Stephanie Vickers
2023-07-14 · WHRC-MacPherson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Janet de Morgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-06-09 · WHRC-MacPherson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Janet de Morgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-05-12 · WHRC-Addington · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Huntsinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
0.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 68% of games
7.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams