Search

Jeff Roe

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
52 matches · 34W–18L · seasons 20212026
Where Jeff sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jeff is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams21 teams · 2005–2026
NWW-STC-Ferry
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
NWW-STC-Slade
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
NWW-STC-Johnson
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
STC-Hagen
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
NWW-STC-Slade
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
NWW-STC-Suver
2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 9.0
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeff has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jeff has gone from the 59th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 52.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.6% of games
9.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
2025-09-20 · NWW-STC-Ferry · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Blakeslee
0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Wolf Yeigh / Erik Lorenz
2024-10-26 · NWW-STC-Slade · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stuart Oswald
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 7-6
L
2024-09-06 · NWW-STC-Slade · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Wagner
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-21 · NWW-STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Terri Agee Smith
+0.000below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-06-29 · NWW-STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Daly
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-06-21 · STC-Hagen · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Russin
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Steven Nguyen / Jeff Bahn
2024-05-11 · STC-Hagen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allan Johnson
0.037below expectation — took 37% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
David Lee / Kevin Kim
2024-04-20 · STC-Hagen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Osborne
0.037below expectation — took 65% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-02-18 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Rosen
0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-02-17 · STC-Johnson/Sheppard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Armstrong
+0.029better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Jeremy Peck / John MacDonald
2024-01-26 · STC-Johnson/Sheppard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Scalzo
0.024below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-01-20 · STC-Johnson/Sheppard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Scalzo
+0.055better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.