Leslie Hardesty
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manakin Sabot, VA
89 matches · 48W–41L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history89 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2025
11 HCC Hardesty Mangin 7.0
HCC Yablonski
HCC-Hardesty Mangin
Hermitage- Wiertel
23 Hermitage Knull
9 Hermitage Hardesty / Mangin
C4 Hermitage Bergeron
HCC Blankley (mixed)
HCC Lines 7.0
HCC Yablonski / Lines
HERM-Hardesty
10 Hermitage Martin/Bergeron
5 Hermitage Lines 3.5
B10 Hermitage Martin/Bergeron
HERM-Hardesty
Hermitage Lines Ladies 7.0
Hermitage Yablonski / Lines
8 Hermitage Hardesty
A3 Hermitage Hardesty
A5 Hermitage Mugford
C7 Hermitage Hall
HCC Kersey
HCC Lines
HCC Mangin
HCC Morgan
HERM-Hardesty
HERM-Mugford
Hermitage Hardesty
17 Hermitage Hardesty
HERM-Hoffer
HERM-Mugford
Hermitage Hardesty
Hermitage Lines
Hermitage Walsh
HERM-Hoffer
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 59% of games
3.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 41.8% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.8% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.9% of games
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 49.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.