← Search

Lisa Fogg

West Linn, OR
0.0 year-end
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Lisa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Lisa is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lisa has gone from the 17th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 42.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history29 matches
L
2023-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Barsotti
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Barsotti
−0.020below expectation — took 46% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jordan
−0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Farrell
+0.021better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2022-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carri Schmidt
−0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carri Schmidt
+0.010about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Nora Semonsen / Gretchen Dumestre
2022-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Barsotti
−0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin
−0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin
+0.013better than expected — took 57% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
N/A
2022-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin
+0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 81% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Lauren Holloway / Katrina Heiles
2022-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin
−0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Wright
−0.032below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.